User talk:PET

Welcome!

Hello, PET, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Selphie 11:03, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC) *talk*

Albums

Wow, nice work on all the albums you've created! Everytime I create albums of articles, I save them right here, wanna see? -- Mike Garcia | talk 01:08, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Italicized titles

Hi. I see that you have edited the style of Dead Kennedys albums (you made them italic).....WHY ? I like how the BOLD looks. In my opinion it looks better cand you can read them...better, cos they are bold. --PET 23:35, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I italicized them because that is the standard style for album titles on Wikipedia, according to Wikipedia:WikiProject_Music, specifically [1]: "Albums are italicized and songs are in quotes." --Myles Long 16:44, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Music

I just got your message. I just have a good taste of music, man. That's why I've created several albums! -- Mike Garcia | talk 21:52, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures

Hey, I saw you added some pictures to wikipedia, i was looking at some of them, and saw that you have not added a copyright tag to them. Image Copyright tags. Any image on the site has to have a copyright tag, please go back and add a copyright tag to your pictures. --ZeWrestler 12:22, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Well, thanks for notice me. I'm starting to add the ©. I have a question. I found a picture Robert Trujillo picutre...but i don't know what copyright tag to put. Any sugetion ? --PET 14:31, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Where did you get the picture from??--ZeWrestler 15:53, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Hypocrisy

Hi there, good job on creating all the Hypocrisy album pages. I took the liberty of fixing a few things there though, like spelling of last names (Tagtgren/Tägtgren, Szoke/Szöke) and some incorrect years in the album box. I also changed the genre from Black metal to Death metal, hope you don't mind. --Hellqvist 22:53, July 17, 2005 (UTC)

Why Hypocrisy are death metal? Personally, I can't see much black metal in their music (except some of the vocals), and they're referred to as "death metal" everywhere. Even on their own home page: http://www.hypocrisy.tv/html/biography.html

Allmusic.com also calls them a death metal band. --Hellqvist 23:25, July 20, 2005 (UTC)

Copyright

You cannot copy other web pages into Wikipedia legally without permission. I have already reverted Gary Karr and Victor DeLorenzo to their prior states, and will continue sifting through your contributions. If I sound extremely annoyed, it is because you have been here long enough to know better. -- Cyrius|✎ 07:18, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Under international law (the Berne Convention), all creative works are copyright with all rights reserved unless it is explicitly stated otherwise. That includes a person's official biography on the person's official site.

In the meantime, I have marked The Gathering (Testament album) as a copyright violation as the bulk of the actual article content consists of a copy/paste from the All Music Guide review. It will be deleted. You may recreate it without the offending material if you would like. -- Cyrius|✎ 07:39, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The offending material has been there since you created the page. There's no "clean" version to revert to. -- Cyrius|✎ 07:43, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vote for Mike Garica

Please feel free to vote for me at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Mike Garcia 2. -- Mike Garcia | talk 15:04, August 4, 2005 (UTC)

Our forum

Welcome to the Romanian Wikipedia notice board! This page is a portal for all Romanian-related topics and a place for Romanian editors to gather and socialize and debate. Discussions are encouraged, in both English and Romanian. Post any inquiry under their relevant cathegory.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Romanian_Wikipedian%27s_notice_board

--Anittas 19:39, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Moldovan langauge

Salut PET! Feel free to contribute to the page of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moldovan_language. -- Bonaparte talk 19:43, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: albums list on bands page

I usually go by

Album Name (1991)
Album Name (1994) -- Mike Garcia 20:38, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

response to your question

article was rv'd mainly due to your own response on the talk page as to why you added the category in the first place. "Stupid guitars, stupid drumming" would seem to indicate a personal POV on your part rather than a general concensus based on overall public opinion. I won't argue it. I personally don't care for the album. But sooner or later it was bound to get rv'd by somebody. It was an invitation for an edit war. If you can cite a few mass trade publications or some widely available polls to link to then you can throw any arguement back in there because there'll be something to back it up. I see it going on a bit there as far as the 'total sales' goes. 57 million in the U.S. and 84 million worldwide based on some valid sources posted by someone earlier. And yet some people keep going back it and changing it to 'over 200 million sold'. It's probably more emotion than statistical fact.Mr Pyles

Raspuns dupa cateva luni

Imi cer iertare ca raspund cu asa intarziere, acum este aprilie 14. Da, sunt Petrar, nascut in Maramures si am facut facultatea de medicina in Timisoara intre 1994 si 2000. Am stat in principal in caminul de langa prefectura dar am mai hoinarit si eu :). Nu am raspuns pt ca singura mea conectie de internet e pe celularul meu si acolo am incercat in repetate randuri sa accesez wikipedia dar nu am reusit. Acum sunt pe computerul scolii. Am asteptat-o pe bibliotecara sa apara ca sa-i folosesc computerul si nu a aparut. Daca vrei sa imi scrii, adresele mele sunt felixpetrar@gmail.com si felixpetrar@yahoo.com (prefer gmail). Imi este dificil sa raspund la emailuri pentru ca trebuie sa scriu textul ca si un SMS, apasand fiecare tasta de cateva ori dar imi este usor sa citesc emailuri. Daca imi scrii pe yahoo, pune in subject ceva text Romanesc. Pana de curand am crezut si eu ca Petrar e un nume rar dar am auzit ca sunt mai multi in Moldova... s-ar putea ca venim din Moldova. Bunicul meu din partea tatalui a fost singurul Ortodox intre Greco-Catolici intr-un sat de langa Baia Mare. El a fost Ardelean dar banuiesc ca nu intamplator a fost el Ortodox, ceva stramos de-al lui a venit din Moldova dupa momentul in care au trecut Romanii Ardeleni la Greco-Catolicism. Oricum, suna arhaic dar Latinesc ceea ce mie imi place. Deci eu sunt politic din Maramures dar cultural din Ardeal. Daca cauti cu google pe net nu vei vedea prea multi Petrari. Numele meu este Felix, care e numele tau? Sper sa iti mai verifici wikipedia. Sa ne auzim cu bine... mai ales ca si mie imi placea Panther in tineretile mele. Felix

Image Tagging for Image:Violentfemmes.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Violentfemmes.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:39, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Control Denied

I removed one guy who isn't listed at [emptywords.org Empty words], and cleaned it up a bit too... Spearhead 14:25, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vino la pagina de discutii Transnistria

În 17 septembrie va fi referendum în Transnistria legat de independenţa regiunii. Cu această ocazie probabil multă lume va căuta pe Wikipedia informaţii despre Transnistria. Am încercat să adaug în articol nişte informaţii legate de acest referendum, anume:

- faptul că mai multe organizaţii antiseparatiste au lansat un apel la boicotare, considerînd referendumul "farsă"

- faptul că din 46 de ţări membre ale Consiliului Europei, 45 sînt împotriva recunoaşterii referendumului, numai RUsia are altă părere

- faptul că datele Comisiei Electorale Centrale din Tiraspol au fost schimbate în mod ciudat, anume numărul total de alegători s-a micşorat cu 7% faţă de 2005, ceea ce ridică suspiciuni asupra unei încercări de creştere artificială a prezenţei la vot prin raportarea unui număr mai mic de alegători înregistraţi.

Totdeauna am dat lincurile care dovedesc cele scrise de mine, n-am născocit nimic din burtă.

Userul Willian Mauco, care pare fan Tiraspol, mereu mi-a şters adăugirile. (vezi istoria paginii)

Puteţi vedea la pagina de discuţii Transnistria ce argumente a adus. Anume: ăia care cer boicotarea referendumului din Transnistria sînt foşti KGB-işti, că aşa zice o organizaţie rusească de analiză (a dat un linc pentru asta). Întîi a spus că respectivii nici nu sînt din Transnistria, ci doar din Basarabia, dar i-am dovedit că unii dintre semnatarii apelului la boicot sînt transnistreni. Am fost împăciuitor, i-am zis că n-are decît să adauge părerea organizaţiei ruseşti că antiseparatiştii sînt foşti KGBişti, că n-are decît să-i considere pe cei care vor boicotarea referendumului drept băieţi răi, dar faptul în sine, că s-a cerut boicotarea referendumului, trebuie menţionat. Degeaba, mereu mi s-au şters adăugirile - pentru celelalte 2 fapte nici n-a adus argumente.

A mai fost o adăugire care a şters-o, despre arestarea a 4 persoane din Transnistria care sînt împotriva separatismului (între timp li s-a dat drumul). În cazul ăsta am renunţat eu să mai insist pentru includerea informaţiei în articol (deşi informaţia e incontestabilă), tocmai fiindcă n-am vrut să mă cert prea mult.

În perioada asta cînd agenţiile de ştiri vor menţiona referendumul de la Tiraspol, se va citi articolul Transnistria în Wikipedia poate mai mult decît într-un an întreg. De aia acum e nevoie să existe în articol informaţii despre contestarea corectitudinii referendumului. Nu cer să se menţioneze ca adevăr absolut faptul că referendumul e incorect, ci doar că există unii (OSCE, 45 din 46 ţări ale Consiliului Europei, unele organizaţii din zonă şi din Basarabia) care consideră asta. Vă cer de aceea sprijinul ca să interveniţi pe pagina de discuţii Transnistria pentru a susţine rămînerea informaţiei în pagină şi să repuneţi informaţia atunci cînd Mauco o şterge (eu nu pot să verific chiar 24 de ore din 24). Evitaţi atacurile suburbane, păstraţi ton civilizat. mulţumesc.

Who is William Mauco Here is an article about a Wikipedia celebrity, William Mauco, and his relations with the International Council for Democratic Institutions and State Sovereignty (ICDISS), an organisation "which seems to be a front organisation for a Kremlin-backed rogue statelet called Transdniestria" (quote from the article) http://0.bypass-filter.com/index.php?q=aHR0cDovL2Vkd2FyZGx1Y2FzLmJsb2dzcG90LmNvbS8yMDA2LzA4L2dvdGNoYS0yLmh0bWw%3D

Edward Lucas wrote about Mauco: "The other lead is William Mauco. He has an extensive record of posting intelligent and fairly neutral entries on Wikipedia, not only about TD but about other unrecognised statelets. Crucially, these predate ICDISS's birthday of January 2006. And he also claims to have been at their conference in Mexico City in April of this year. I have written to him asking to get in touch, and had a friendly email in reply. I am planning to follow up this research in an article in European Voice at the end of August, so watch this space!"--MariusM 08:32, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Votează contra ştergerii articolului Heaven of Transnistria

Împreună cu EvilAlex (un tip din Tighina - Transnistria) am creat un articol despre propaganda separatistă a Tiraspolului Heaven of Transnistria. I s-a cerut ştergerea. Te rog ajută-ne să păstrăm articolul, votînd contra ştergerii[2]. Destul s-a şters din articolul principal Transnistria, Wikipedia e plină de propagandă a Tiraspolului, să avem măcar un articol care explică această propagandă--MariusM 18:37, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Happy Birthday, PET! Wishing you a very happy birthday and an awesome upcoming year! Don't forget to save us all a piece of cake!

Best regards from the Birthday Committee and myself! --lov e laughterlife♥^talk? 04:05, 16 December 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Blocking an IP

If you have noticed a consistent set of vandalization, you first need to warn editor/vandal using the test templates found here. If the user has been given a final warning via the test4 template, the IP can be reported here; be sure to follow its instructions. Hope this helps. -- GJD 17:48, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bizarre reaction to a list of Jesuit activities

Whatever you FEEL like it says, it actually "says" a list of their apostolates; they run 28 colleges and universities in US alone, plus the Weston School of Theology, the Jesuit School of Theology at Berkeley, and individual Jesuits have and do serve on the faculties of dozens of other universities, plus they run several scholarly and semi-popular publications, and that's just for openers and only in the US -- so saying that "Their works are focused on education and intellectual contributions, primarily at colleges and universities," is not cheerleading. The "as well as missionary work " is built into their own constitutions: technically they were founded as a missionary order, and jesuit missions are found today all over Africa, South America, Asia and the Pacific Islands. The "ministry in human rights and social justice" is witnessed by the fact that they have their own, full-blown NGO, The Jesuit Refugee Service, and jesuits serve on the stafs of a wide variety of deomestic and foreign social justice agencies. Nowhere does this paragraph say Jesuits are the "only" ones to do all this, or that they "do it better than anyone else." The sentence is simple and NPOV: the fact you react to it with such "feelings" is something that should prompt an examination of why, on your poart, not removal from the article.HarvardOxon 23:26, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of VOIS.com

An editor has nominated VOIS.com, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VOIS.com and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:59, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Point

You might want to read WP:POINT as well as WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, every article has to stand on its own. The nexopia article for example had two clear citations from reliable sources (two major newspaper, the edmonton journal and the globe and mail). We don't keep an article which fails policy and guidelines simply because another one does, we examine that other article. On the consumating article you notice I actually nominated it for deletion, but notability was properly established Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Consumating. the sportsvite one is the only one that really should be tagged of those three, notability is likely, but proper citation hasn't been provided.--Crossmr (talk) 20:43, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reporting an IP

If you see an IP who is vandalizing actively have a look at WP:AIV. This is used for IPs who are vandalizing at the moment. if its been more than 30-60 minutes since their last edit, they're unlikely to block them then.--Crossmr (talk) 05:42, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Craig Agranoff

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Craig Agranoff, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://craigagranoff.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:53, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Craig Agranoff

A tag has been placed on Craig Agranoff requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ttonyb (talk) 23:56, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Craig Agranoff. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. ttonyb (talk) 23:59, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Craig Agranoff

A tag has been placed on Craig Agranoff requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 03:17, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Craig agranoff.jpeg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Craig agranoff.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:51, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Coram deo.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Coram deo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:59, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Dacia

Bună! I've been working to set up the WikiProject Dacia to organize better the articles about Dacia and improve their quality. We need help expanding and reviewing many articles, and we also need more images. Maybe you find it interesting and wish to join. Thanks and best regards! --Codrin.B (talk) 21:58, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TheSoundOfPerseverance.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheSoundOfPerseverance.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:56, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Craig Agranoff

The article Craig Agranoff has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable technology writer and the content is orieented towards promoting him and his products

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sadads (talk) 14:41, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Leprosy Album.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Leprosy Album.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:23, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Romania

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Romania. It is a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to Romania. Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 04:37, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Craig agranoff.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Craig agranoff.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. :Jay8g ^{Hi!- I am... -What I do...} _{WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM} 00:43, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Pleasure of Molestation.gif)

Thanks for uploading File:Pleasure of Molestation.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:08, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 10 Years of Chaos and Confusion for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 10 Years of Chaos and Confusion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/10 Years of Chaos and Confusion until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Steve Quinn (talk) 04:16, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Penetralia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Penetralia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penetralia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Steve Quinn (talk) 04:24, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Fourth Dimension (Hypocrisy album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Fourth Dimension (Hypocrisy album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fourth Dimension (Hypocrisy album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Steve Quinn (talk) 04:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Obsculum Obscenum.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Obsculum Obscenum.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, PET. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Penetralia.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Penetralia.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:06, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, PET. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Stefan popa.jpg

The file File:Stefan popa.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Personal file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:16, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sadus out for blood.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sadus out for blood.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abducted (album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abducted (album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abducted (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:25, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fourth Dimension.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fourth Dimension.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Final chapter.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Final chapter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bgg cornerlogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bgg cornerlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Blazzaj

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Blazzaj requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mach61 (talk) 15:12, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Testament best.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Testament best.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:58, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]