Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1T-SRAM
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - no consensus - SimonP 22:18, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)
"MoSys has not released any solid information on their 1 T-SRAM." Vaporware. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Xcali 19:43, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Retain Information may be missing, but there are numerous accounts of this technology being used in Gamecube and their newest upcoming console. I suggest making the corrections and additions neccessary, and keep the article. For reference, I logged onto the site searching specificly for information on this item. -- Ritz 14:28, 08 June 2005
Delete. This is vaporware (in development for five years), and not notable vaporware like Duke Nukem Forever.AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 21:10, May 27, 2005 (UTC)- 1T-SRAM is not vaporware, as it is used in the Gamecube. --Pezezin 12:23, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Clean up Joey.dale 03:26, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. WP is not an electronic parts catalog. There's no indication that this part is in any way significant. The manufacturer's website provides little evidence of notability, since it is advertizing. Quale 06:32, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete speculation about a vaporous product that would be only marginally notable anyway. CDC (talk) 05:14, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I did do a little editing on it, but I'm jumping on the bandwagon - delete StopTheFiling June 2, 2005
- Keep the article has been much improved since it was nominated. - SimonP 22:18, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.