Talk:Pavonis Mons

Astronomy: Astronomical objects / Mars / Solar System Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.
	This article is supported by Mars task force (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as High-importance).

Volcanoes Mid‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Possible Evidence of Plate Tectonics

I think this section gives undue weight to the possible plate tectonic origin of the Tharsis Montes. See my comments on Ascraeus Mons article. Plate tectonics as an explanation for the Tharsis Montes alignment is controversial and not the prevailing view. Also, two papers [Sleep, 1994 and Connerney et al., 2005] cited in the references present a different view of the plate tectonic context of the Tharsis Montes. Sleep suggests the montes are analogs to terrestrial island arc volcanoes associated with a subduction zone. Connerney at al. compares the Tharsis Montes to the movement of a "Tharsis plate" over a stationary hot spot, similar to the fomation of the Hawaiian island chain. These two models are not distinguished in the article.

I definitely think a discussion of possible plate tectonics on early Mars is important. The hypothesis is by no means fringe science. It's just that the topic is too detailed to present a balanced view in a short article on Pavonis Mars, or any of the other Tharsis Montes. Schaffman (talk) 20:58, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Pavonis Mons. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:10, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]