Talk:Bill Hayden

"Alienation from his former party"

Bill attended the last Labor function I was at, in which several speakers made reference to the fact that he had re-joined the party. Perhaps the article is in need of an update? Slac speak up! 01:35, 15 May 2005 (UTC)

Can we find a source? Adam 01:40, 15 May 2005 (UTC)

Kim Beazley and several other speakers made mention of it several times at the Labor Leaders dinner in Brisbane earlier this year, at which Bill Hayden was in attendance. I was there, I assume Slac was also there. QLD State Secretary Milton Dick was also there, and he acknowledged Bill although I don't recall whether he was one of the speakers who said that he had re-joined the Party. I think the article needs an update! --Anon — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.181.251.66 (talk) 07:37, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Photo

Is it possible to find a photo of Bill Hayden as Governor-General ie a photo from the 1980's rather than one from when he entered Parliament in the late 1960s ? Paddington62 3 march 2006 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.153.2.2 (talk) 07:21, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

I have updated the picture to one from 1987, this one seemed suitable as this exact image was not used elsewhere on this page but it was cropped from another picture on the page, I could not find many other suitable images of Hayden.

At the moment the picture I have used on the main page has been reverted to an older one from around 1971. I am unsure of whether better images are available from sources other than Wikipedia Commons or that image will be suitable. Qwerty123M (talk) 06:27, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Band Member?

I am pretty sure this is not the Bill Hayden from the british metal band jerusalem. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.208.78.62 (talk) 01:30, 19 February 2007 (UTC).

So am I — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.149.29.82 (talk) 14:41, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Declined to be Chief Scout

Was it Hayden who declined the normal practice of the G-G becoming the Chief Scout of Australia, on the grounds that the Scout oath was inimical to his atheism? JackofOz 11:19, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

To answer my own question, yes, it was. This is a cite for the GG normally being made Chief Scout. And this confirms that Hayden said thanks, but no thanks. Disclaimer: I have no association whatsoever with the League of Rights or what they stand for; this was the only cite I could find on Google. -- JackofOz 00:17, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Prime Minister Hayden?

Four former prime ministers - Gough Whitlam, Bob Hawke, Paul Keating and Bill Hayden - were among those paying their respects... time to update the wiki or jump up and down over how the media don't proof their articles these days? :P Timeshift 08:10, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Sources, etc.

Hi, I believe a some passages in the article need to be sourced, trimmed of weasel words and have their pov cleaned.

I have marked these passages in the text, and, following timeshift's suggestion, I'm adding them here for discussion. I apologize for not starting this discussion here the first time I tagged the problematic sentences. I acted that way because I believe this tagging to be uncontroversial.

They are:

Non-neutral point of view (POV)

1. "By 1982 it was clear that Fraser was manoeuvring to call an early election,"

   "Clear"?

2. "...Hayden, still emotional, said that "a drover's dog..."

   "Emotional" is the authors opinion. A neutral encyclopedia should avoid that language.

3. "In a remarkable 1983 speech..."

   "Remarkable" is quite povvy.

Use of Weasel words

1. "In December Labor failed to win the vital Flinders by-election, reinforcing doubts about Hayden's ability to win an election."

   Whose doubts? I believe this passage is loaded.

Lack of sources

1. "Hawke continued to plot against Hayden."

   This being a biorgaphy of a living person, this passage should actually be removed instead of tagged.

2. "...Hayden's closest supporters told him that he must resign,..."

   Is that a first person account? What's the reliable source we attribute this to?

Thanks, --Damiens.rf 13:00, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

attempt at a re-edit

Here is a copy of an edit i made to the main article that was totally reverted. While perhaps some of the assertions are still unsourced, I have endeavoured to remove weasel wording and biased phraseology (as identified by other editors). However, I dont believe the arbirtary blanket reversion (by one user) of all of the editing to the previous (and contentious) version was the best way to proceed in improving the article.

I suggest that from this takkpage, sentences or paragraphs that are consensually agreeable should be reinstated into the main article. Jabberjawjapan (talk) 08:53, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Politics

He became active in the Labor Party, and in the 1961 election he surprised many, by winning the House of Representatives seat of Oxley, defeating Donald Alastair Cameron, the Minister for Health in the Menzies Liberal government.

In 1969 Hayden was elected to the Opposition front bench. When Labor under Gough Whitlam won the 1972 election, Hayden became Minister for Social Security, and in that capacity introduced Medibank, Australia's first system of universal health insurance. In June 1975 he succeeded Jim Cairns as Treasurer (finance minister), a position he held until the Whitlam Government was dismissed by the Governor-General, Sir John Kerr, on 11 November 1975.

When Labor lost the 1977 election, Whitlam resigned as leader and Hayden was elected to succeed him. His political views had shifted to the centre, and he advocated economic policies which favoured the private sector and supported the American alliance. At the 1980 election he improved Labor's position but narrowly failed to defeat Malcolm Fraser's Liberal government. The popular union leader Bob Hawke, known to harbour Labour leadership ambitions, was elected to Parliament.

By 1982 Fraser was manoeuvering to call an early election, and Hawke began organising his supporters to challenge Hayden's leadership. On 16 July Hayden narrowly defeated Hawke's challenge in a party ballot, but Hawke continued to campaign against Hayden. Then in December Labor failed to win the important Flinders by-election, increasing criticism from his rivals about his ability to win an election.

On 3 February 1983, in a meeting in Brisbane, supporters close to Hayden's advised him to resign, which he did. Hawke was then elected leader unopposed. Later that morning, unaware of the events in Brisbane, Fraser in Canberra called a snap election for 5 March. At a press conference that afternoon Hayden, still shaken by the leadership challenge, said that "a drover's dog could lead the Labor Party to victory at the present time". Labor under Hawke won the 1983 election, and Hayden became Minister for Foreign Affairs, a position he held until 1988.

As Foreign Minister, Hayden advocated closer integration between Australia and its Asian neighbours. In a 1983 speech, he stated: "Australia is changing. We're an anomaly as a European country in this part of the world. There's already a large and growing Asian population in Australia and it is inevitable in my view that Australia will become a Eurasian country... I happen to think that's desirable."

Governor-General

After the 1987 federal election Hawke offered Hayden the post of Governor-General to provide him an exit from parliamentary politics and perhaps some consolation for having denied him the chance to become Prime Minister. The appointment of Hayden as the next Governor-General to succeed Sir Ninian Stephen was publicly announced in mid-1988, and he immediately left parliament and all connections with the Labor Party. He assumed the post in early 1989, and served during the transition from the Hawke government to the Keating government in December 1991.

Early in his term, he was appointed Companion of the Order of Australia to fulfil the Governor-General's role as Chancellor and Principal Companion of the Order. He had previously said he would never accept any honours. Early in his term, he was appointed Companion of the Order of Australia to fulfil the Governor-General's role as Chancellor and Principal Companion of the Order. He had previously said he would never accept any honours.

Later life

After Hayden left office in 1996, however, there was still unresolved tension with the Labor Party. He had a difficult relationship with Paul Keating, whom he believed engineered the 1983 leadership challenge. By the late 1990s however, Hayden had become a conservative, joining the board of the conservative magazine Quadrant. In the debate preceding the 1999 republic referendum, Hayden rejected the specific proposal and sided with the monarchists, claiming he only supports direct election of a president.

References

Return to campaigning for Labor

Bill Hayden was interviewed by Chris Uhlmann at Julia Gillard's campaign "launch" in Brisbane today. He said he and his wife have been campaigning for Labor in the seat of Blair. My impression was that he'd kept out of party politics since becoming Governor-General, including after he left the office, which would be normal procedure for ex G-Gs. He also mentioned, in saying how impressed he was by Julia Gillard's speech, that he "had never heard the woman speak before", so he obviously isn't keeping up with recent developments. A very odd little interview. -- Jack of Oz ... speak! ... 03:03, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Bill Hayden.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Bill Hayden.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 05:19, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Request for Comments

There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages.

The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion.

Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 03:56, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Hayden supported the Republic "Yes" vote?

I'm surprised to see the article says that Hayden supported the republic "No" vote. I won't argue with the cite that he opposed it as late as 7 October 1999 [1], but I am sure I remember him saying he supported "Yes" and, when pressed, said words to the effect of "I changed my mind". It was on a televised debate very soon before the (6 November 1999) vote, which included Hazel Hawke and Geoffrey Robertson also advocating "Yes". Can anyone else remember this? Or better still, reference it? Adpete (talk) 05:21, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Well he was still advocating No as late as 2-Nov-1999. [2] It seems my memory is faulty. Adpete (talk) 05:26, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bill Hayden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.republic.org.au/ARM-2001/mediaroom/mr16.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080720045736/http://www.alumni.uq.edu.au/bill-hayden-former-australian-governor-general to http://www.alumni.uq.edu.au/bill-hayden-former-australian-governor-general

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bill Hayden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071012082612/http://scouts.com.au/main.asp?iStoryID=734 to http://www.scouts.com.au/main.asp?iStoryID=734
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071204004515/http://www.alor.org/Volume25/Vol25No13.htm to http://www.alor.org/Volume25/Vol25No13.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:53, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Earliest surviving?

Thescrubbythug has been fiddling with this article and now describes Hayden as "the earliest elected Labor MP still alive." This seems very clumsy wording to me, and not all that helpful a fact. It's not directly sourced, so also appears to be original research. It evolved during some edit skirmishing yesterday from his initial effort of "the earliest surviving Labor MP", also quite clumsy wording. His edit summaries became quite rude, so I withdrew. I am now wondering if "earliest surviving" is a distortion of the far more common expression "longest serving". "Serving" and "surviving" have a kind of similarity of sound and look. Have we ended up with the latest wording by beginning with a mistake? HiLo48 (talk) 21:52, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi HiLo48. I agree the wording around senior living politicians can become difficult to understand, but I believe it’s easy enough in this case. A source that listed his date of election could simply be added; working out an MP who started before another is not original research, it’s simple numerical data; Wikipedia prohibits the synthesis of material to put forward an original argument. Dates are facts, not original arguments or opinions; they exist regardless. There is no research required, only the earliest date of election has to be found. Furthermore, the fact is notable and important regarding parliamentary history.

“Longest serving” would imply that he served for a period longer than any other MP, while ”earliest surviving/most senior living” means that out of all the Labor MPs (living or former), he has the earliest date of election (he was elected further in the past than anyone else). I would love suggestions from anyone else who can work out a better way to phrase this. Hope the explanation helped. Cheers. SpaceFox99 (talk) 02:41, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Neither "earliest surviving" nor "most senior living" mean "he was elected further in the past than anyone else". Well, not in good quality English. And those expressions are both gruesome English, not matter what they mean. Maybe we just need to use a few more words to say what we really mean. HiLo48 (talk) 03:08, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Fair enough, let’s try not to overcomplicate it though! :) (perhaps: Bill Hayden... and the living Labor MP with the earliest date of election.)SpaceFox99 (talk) 03:22, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

What on earth is wrong with "Hayden has been a Labor member of parliament longer than anyone else"? HiLo48 (talk) 22:27, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

He hasn’t; Paul Keating comes to mind? He is the surviving Labor MP with the earliest date of election, though. SpaceFox99 (talk) 22:36, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Alright, make it "Among current members, Hayden has been a Labor member of parliament longer than anyone else." ? HiLo48 (talk) 23:09, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Should add that Hayden shares this distinction with Manfred Cross and Doug McClelland, having all been elected in the same election. As for Paul Keating, he was first elected in 1969, so as of now he's far from the earliest surviving Labor MP. Thescrubbythug (talk) 07:07, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Two things. Firstly, given that Hayden shares this status with two others, I wonder if it's really worth mentioning. Secondly, I still don't think "earliest surviving" means anything like what you want it to mean. HiLo48 (talk) 07:28, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

So far it seems like it's only yourself who is misinterpreting and taking issue with the whole "earliest surviving" or "earliest elected MP still alive" phrasing. As for your suggestion of the phrasing, it can easily be misinterpreted as Hayden being a longer serving Labor MP than anyone else - which is not only inaccurate but also implies that he is still an MP today. Nobody else has really brought up the original phrasing as any major issue, and it's been pretty long established - as demonstrated on the pages for Bill Grayden and George Pearce. Both of whom are Liberals who were first elected in 1949 and are currently the earliest elected MPs still alive from any party. I don't see any issue with this distinction being mentioned, and more or less agree with SpaceFox99 on this. Thescrubbythug (talk) 08:35, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

I suggest you stop spending so much time talking about me, rather than the issue. And there might be a very obvious reason nobody has questioned the wording of the pages for Bill Grayden and George Pearce. Nobody ever looks at them? HiLo48 (talk) 08:57, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

If this is how you choose to interpret my responses (which in turn come after having being described as "rude", having my contributions dismissed as "reading like nonsense" and reverted without any attempt at amendment, and as a whole making a mountain out of a molehill), then I'm afraid that is your issue. I did try and offer critique as to why your "Among current members, Hayden has been a Labor member of parliament longer than anyone else" suggestion would be a deeply flawed one, and would only serve to confuse and cause readers to misinterpret, but you chose not to comment on that. The initial edit on the Hayden page (without the citation and all) wasn't perfect, but it warranted amendment and not out-of-hand removal. It has since been better-worded (which as it currently stands would be hard to misinterpret as anything other than the fact that Hayden - along with Cross and McClelland - is the earliest elected Labor MP still alive) and cited, and I honestly have more constructive things to do than to carry on this pointless debate about a non-existing "issue". That said, if there are other editors who take issue with the current wording, and a consensus grows that there needs to be some changes made, I'm happy to help contribute. Until then, I'm not wasting any more time on this. Thescrubbythug (talk) 13:29, 21 January 2020 (UTC)