Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Self-proclaimed Emperors of Moravia and its "government"
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – Rich Farmbrough 12:04, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I suggest this article be deleted. Its very title is POV. → JarlaxleArtemis 22:33, May 8, 2005 (UTC)
I say no,because such a micronation does exist,yet we(because
- Speedy delete. Patent nonsense, vanity, intended as joke, created by vandal. Pavel Vozenilek 11:32, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
im the said "Tomislav I.",proclaimed by
my family without my anticipation) have not managed
to create a website and
no news paper took us seriosly enough to write about us,and the television ignored as as a
result that a Czech person proclaime d a micronation to escape taxation.
All the other pages have ignored us as well.Please be reasonable.
A website takes some time to build,so until then,could you just trust what i am saying?I have already expanded(although under other nick names) the Wikipedia,so i have no need for lying.P-L-E-A-S-E have a heart.How else can we proclaim a micronations existence? And wikipedia is also a good port where a lot of
people would recognise our claim.P-L-E-A-A-A-S-E-.
Yours sincerily Tomislav I.(David for friends)
- Again, the above was by 85.70.52.185 at 22:42, 8 May 2005. For his other rather colorful entries and complete disregard of wikipedia rules and ettiquette, note his user contributions here as well as his votes (above) on his Moravia article. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson 04:19, 13 May 2005 (UTC) [reply]
- Delete If no newspaper would cover your made-up "nation", what on earth made you think that an encyclopedia would? Geez, get your own website. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 03:20, May 9, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable. Martg76 20:34, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not notable at this time. ESkog 22:31, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- "All the other pages have ignored us as well'. Even more reason to delete. Delete all micronationscruft. RickK 23:39, May 9, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable. Megan1967 02:07, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Everyone else ignores them as they are not in any way the slightest bit significant or influential. Wikipedia is not here to fix that. Average Earthman 08:59, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - irrelevant even as a micronation, possible pro-pretender connection - Skysmith 09:51, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
NOT DELETE-1th I couldn't create an own website yet.2.the newpapers around here are so greedy they want payment for such a publication,or they told me that either im a freak,cook,weirdo,pervert,madman,etc.etc.etc. or said they have no rome,time or will.Consider it this way:if you would bust your brains out to actually get so,ethink noted,for what you have only paper-evidence(inpenendance proclamations,calls to the people,etc...)and you dont have a skaner,you hope the people will belive you.And if they dont,you have full right to be angry.And if people dont trust one-another anymore,then i ges the worlds gome more to heck than i thought.The principe of a micronation is as far as i know CLAIM and PROCLAMATION.This page does not say(to the best of my knowledge) that in order to be listed here you need a WEBSITE.The first king of Redobda also didnt have a homepage,yet is still recognised.The island also doesnt have any newpaper as far as i know curently,so no newsaper IN REDONDA mentioned the CLAIM for redonda's THRONE.Another thing-why cant a person proclaim a micronation HERE and not be acused of VANDALISM?I could also complain how i used,under various other nicks,knock my Brains out to MODIFY this site nad what do i GET?The COLD SHOULDER,thats what.PEOPLE,have a heart.Besides i've got a internet newpaper (www.solokapr.cz)in witch,"under circumstances"(thats what one of its editors told me)"my case" could be presented.Wait a 2,2 weeks and see(its wery far into the centre of thet newspaper from my home and i need to get all materials together. Your ever-so angry David. Ps:If there wasnt i you STILL woildnt have the deposed monarchs lists from the 19th-before the 17th century.Think about what YOU write in articles and THEN re-consider your aproach on maters,such as Deletion,even though the said thing does not technicaly range beyond the limits of the describsion of a certain subject(i repete the generals for a MICRONATION:A PROCLAMATIOn and NO RECOGNITION.
- Yet again, 85.70.52.185 at 16:05, 12 May 2005. Are the admins watching this guy? --Jeffrey O. Gustafson 04:19, 13 May 2005 (UTC) [reply]
- Delete. As non-notable as my own fictional kingdom Imaginativa, which doesn't have any article in Wikipedia as far as I know (If there was any article, I would vote for deleting it). --Neigel von Teighen 16:19, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete. Fictional nation entry from the person who runs said fictional country. Possible kook entry. Non notable, vanity, and a troubling lack of adherence to rules and procedures. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson 04:19, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
NOT DELETE-YOU WANTED RECOGNITION ILL GIVE YOU RECOGNITION on: http://www.kingnicholas.com/2005/05/international-diplomacy.html
the page of a micronation you RECOGNISED AS SUCH is the information on my
comunication with Nicholas I, of the Copeman Empiere and his "response",when
you click on it enholds:
"I certainly see no problem in recognising your empire's existence. "
How's them aples?
Your ever so PLEASED Tomislav I. or as some of my oponents here could write 85.70.52.185
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.