Talk:KL Monorail

Trains: Monorail Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	January 31 2006

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Monorail task force.

This article lacks references.

Malaysia Mid‑importance

	Malaysia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malaysia and Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:KL Monorail Line.

Number of passengers

Please determine how many "penumpang" is allowed on a traing and add the number to the paragraph if anyone cares...kindly delete this entry once that is added. --Malbear 02:51, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Cite references

What's the source with regards to the extensions/new lines? Painkille 16:13, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added a citation for that section.--MrFish^{Go Fish} 20:17, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sponsors?

I think the sponsors area is too much of an advertisement. I think we should delete that part. Tkuok shern 06:33, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Somehow I agree with you. --Bukhrin 08:39, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Titiwangsa stations

The Titiwangsa KL Monorail station and Sri Petaling and Ampang Line stations are next to each other and are almost at the same elevated level. However, pedestrian access between both stations require pedestrians to descend to the road level below before entering the other station.

I insist that this is not valid anymore because I've passed by the site of the two stations a few times and noticed that there is a bridge link between the stations. I have pictorial evidence at http://farm1.static.flickr.com/169/384192800_a3adb9bcd1_b.jpg — notice the bridge at the right of this picture of the LRT station. Though out of scope I know that the Monorail station is next to the LRT station in scope. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.176.147.72 (talk) 05:53, 12 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Inconsistent

It is currently described as both a "critical component" of the network, and "just for joyriding". Can't be both, can it? The tone of this article is snippy, which I don't think an encyclopedia need be. Some of the criticisms are naive at best - no doubt some of the supports are not entirely convenient, but there was a city in the way when it was built!. Likewise the positioning of the stations is not a free choice for planners or builders. Midgley 12:01, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, if the city planners changed Jalan Sultan Ismail into a one-way road after the monorail was designed, that is hardly the fault of the monorail. Anyway, it's not the only case where a dual carriageway road has been made one-way on both sides of the central reservation. Whether that is sensible or not has nothing to do with the monorail. I propose to remove the paragraph headed "Poor planning in construction of viaducts" unless somebody can produce a reference for this criticism having been published and justified in the media. Alarics (talk) 06:40, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if that paragraph was translated from the Malaysian Wikipedia or what, but it sure did not make any sense to me in English. On top of that it was unsourced critical bias. It's gone now. æron phone home 13:23, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OR

The Criticisms section does not cite sources, and I suspect that not all the information has a source. Comments?--MrFish^{Go Fish} 17:20, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This Criticisms section is merely voice out the fact. I agree on Integration with other lines, Poor ergonomics and Expensive rides sections. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.121.171.229 (talk) 16:19, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Merely voicing out the facts" is not good enough. You may know these facts, but you have to find somewhere where these criticisms have been published in a reliable source. I have deleted some unsourced assertions that have been tagged for three years. There are several more claims that need sources. Those will also get deleted in due course, if somebody doesn't come up with proper citations. Alarics (talk) 13:31, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rename as "KL Monorail"

Based on their website, the official name of the monorail is "KL Monorail", not "Kuala Lumpur Monorail". The article should thus be moved. Jpatokal 11:34, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agree... it should be moved. MS wikipedia has moved the article to KL Monorail aswell....--Zack2007 12:43, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Station(s) between Tun Sambathan and Hang Tuah

As we can see, there is the Maharajalela Monorail station between Tun Sambanthan Monorail station and Hang Tuah Monorail station. But I've seen an old transport map which shows that there were two stations, namely Sultan Sulaiman and Merdeka! Can anyone please explain? --אדמוןד ואודס_{自分の投稿記録} 19:00, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"KL Monorail" to "Monorail Line"

Since the integration of KL Monorail into Rapid Rail, it is known as Monorail Line. This article should replace the name to portray the changes.Tafeax (talk) 22:57, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 8 external links on KL Monorail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:32, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on KL Monorail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ipsofactoj.com/appeal/2005/Part1/app2005%281%29-010.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070308001748/http://www.monorails.org/tMspages/KLspecial01.html to http://www.monorails.org/tMspages/KLspecial01.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:44, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on KL Monorail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:59, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on KL Monorail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:42, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Archival ridership statistics for KL Monorail (2003-2008)

The new MOT website for quarterly rail ridership statistics is missing data from 2003-2008, and no Wikipedians have created a ridership table for the KL Monorail. Would be highly appreciated if someone could assist in finding data from this time period. HejTuWou (talk) 07:12, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]