Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Pennington conspiracy

Article listed on WP:VFD Apr 28 to May 6 2004, consensus was not reached, but was listed as a copyvio. Discussion:

Michael_Pennington_conspiracy: was on VfD over a month ago votes were 9 to 4 in favour of deletion, but it was decided to give it some time on Cleanup to see if it could be improved. It has now spent a full month on Cleanup with no changes. See Talk:Michael Pennington conspiracy for the original deletion debate. - SimonP 20:24, Apr 28, 2004 (UTC)

• First of all, I don't think it looks all that bad; second, it ain't hurting anybody staying where it is. So Keep if it can be reworked to not be a copyvio. You'd prefer to have no article at all on this subject? Everyking 21:39, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • Yes. Delete. Aside from being worthless tripe about a fabricated message from beyond the bulletin board, it's also a copyvio [1]. So let's just exorcise this ghostly garbage. Wile E. Heresiarch 00:01, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Hoax. Andrewa 03:00, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • Well, I agree that it's a hoax, but do you mean a hoax as in Piltdown Man or a hoax as in something that nobody believes and was made up just to mess with Wikipedia? Everyking 04:05, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)

• It should remain in a much abbreviated form as an example of urban legend. Alcarillo 19:37, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)

• Placed copyvio notice on article. Rewrites without copyvio can be done at Michael Pennington conspiracy/Temp. --Zigger 05:30, 2004 May 1 (UTC)

End discussion