Talk:whitehouse.com

Pornography Mid‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Websites: Computing

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

According to the article, whitehouse.com is "#1 Internet adult site". Where do those statistics come from? Eurleif 08:52, Jan 8, 2004 (UTC)

Any particular reason why the table of contents is on the right in this article? It seems a bit inconsistent with the Wikipedia aesthetic. Also, the current website at WAPAAAAHH.com appears to be a non-government entity that offers government statistical data. Could someone who knows more about this site add a description to the Current Status section? --LostLeviathan 06:57, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like whoever owns the domain now can't seem to make up his/her/their mind about what to do with it; it's had a bewildering array of different uses over the last year or so. Maybe they're just trying everything they can think of until they find something they can make money on (but porn was the only thing that actually succeeded). *Dan T.* 11:47, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

the controversy section

I'm a bit unsatisfied with the controversy section, at least the parts that are explaining the .gov versus .com issue. It's factually correct, but not too exact.

- -

Uh -- "much less obscene"? Isn't obscenity a specific legal term? I suspect the author meant something like "less sexually explicit."

PC world article

This is currently linked to from PC World's 25 worst websites just so you are all aware.Birgitte§β ʈ Talk 16:38, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Owners?

Two things: Could someone verify that Ransom Scott was the original owner of the site? All the sources I've seen, including the White House letter linked to on the page, site Dan Parisi as the owner (he was also the person who the Clinton administration sent the letter to, not Ransom Scott as the Wiki article suggests.

Second, could anyone cite who is the current owner of the website? I'm not sure if this information is freely available, but it would be nice to include on this page to who/when/for how much Parisi sold the domain name for, if he did in fact sell it. Echnaret (talk) 19:35, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

After doing a Whois search on the site, it appears that Parisi is still the owner of the site, at least as far as billing information is concerned. Echnaret (talk) 19:43, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Current Status

Article states "As of February 2010, the site is now owned by the US government and now redirects to www.whitehouse.gov." Ummmm, no it doesn't. I copy and pasted just to make sure I wasn't copying and the website I got was talking about all sorts of Financial Aid and was definetly NOT whitehouse.gov. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.239.26.184 (talk) 03:35, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Out of date

The site is back to porn now. Ganondox (talk) 05:10, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

This article appears to be mostly such. Thmazing (talk) 18:32, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]