Talk:Brainfuck

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brainfuck article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Computer science Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Leslie Horns (8 January 2015). "The Weekend Wikipedia Went "Brainfuck" Crazy". Gizmodo.

Breaking programs/commands into small steps

I do not agree with this edit. There is some significant disagreement about the most appropriate wording. At least two editors obviously have a different opinion than mine.

Here is my rationale:

Computer programming can be descibed as a process of breaking programs down to smaller steps, or similarly, breaking programs down to small "commands".

Therefore, a programmer has to break down programs into (small) commands; in the case of BF, a programmer has to break down programs into microscopic commands.

In my opinion, it is not sensible to say that "commands" need to be broken down, because the "commands" are the end-goal. In BF, they are actually called "commands"; other languages may use different terminology, like "instructions", or "statements". "Commands" are the basic elements provided by any specific programming language; "commands" are not supposed to be divided further.

Here are a few suggestions for alternative wording, which would still be correct from my perspective:

"to break tasks down to microscopic steps"
"to break tasks down into microscopic commands"
"to break desired functionality down to microscopic steps"
"to break desired functionality down into microscopic commands"
"to break program down into microscopic commands"

I'm not a native english speaker, so this might be a question of language barrier, where different terminology is employed in my native language when compared to English. Can anyone shine some light, what exactly is happening here? I'm quite confused by this strange disagreement. Z80Spectrum (talk) 14:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Machine language

The article states "Müller's original compiler was implemented in machine language and compiled to a binary with a size of 296 bytes." But if it was compiled is was presumably written in assembly language. Machine language is the result of the compilation. BruceThomson (talk) 09:38, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed the issue. As can be seen from the aminet distribution, the compiler was implemented in assembly. Erkcan (talk) 05:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Müller as physics student

There are a number of sources on the internet about Urban Müller being a physics student. However except for the domain name of the email address he used in 1993, no indication of him being related to any physics topic can be found. On the other hand, in a January 1995 interview with the online magazine Amiga Report, he states that he is a Computer Science student. [1] He might have switched majors, but it is unclear. Hence I have simply replaced "physics student" with just "student" in the article for now. Erkcan (talk) 07:36, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]