Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Category:Writers who have killed themselves
The following discussion comes from Wikipedia:Categories for deletion. This is an archive of the discussion only; please do not edit this page. -Kbdank71 18:56, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
From the discussion on the category's talk page:
Summary after 2 weeks — no clear-cut consensus => move to /unresolved
- 5 Delete: Postdlf; john k; MadreBurro; RedWolf; Pjacobi
- 0 Keep: no support
- 3 Move: Grutness; Theoretique; Wincoote
- I disagree. There is a definite consensus to delete the category and move the contents to category:Suicides. -Kbdank71 18:55, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete and merge into Category:Suicides: Unpractical name, unneeded subcategorization. -- User:Docu
- Delete. Unnecessary. Postdlf 16:18, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Change name to Category:Writers who committed suicide. Still a relative clause, but a more succinct one. It is a reasonable category, and I suspect is (or could be) moderately heavily populated. Grutness|hello?
00:20, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- That main category is overpopulated and in chronic need of subcategorisation in my opinion. Wincoote 00:14, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Why not "Writers who have committed suicide" or even "category:suicides:writers"? The one in use is just too informal. --Theoretique 10:02, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Agree with the first suggestion as an improvement. Wincoote 00:14, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Category:Suicides seems good enough. john k 00:48, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Yes, Suicides is fine, and writers as a sub if there are enough of them. MadreBurro 17:54, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Comment - Wikipedia:Categorization says: Don't hard-code the category structure into names. Example: "Monarchs", not "People - Monarchs". "Category:Suicides:Writers" does not conform to this guideline. -- Beland 05:39, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Unnecessary categorization. RedWolf 01:28, Mar 25, 2005 (UTC)
- Please delete. --Pjacobi 14:52, 2005 Mar 27 (UTC)