Jump to content

Talk:Non-binary gender

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Xenogender flag?

    [edit]

    So Xenogender redirects to Non-binary_gender#Xenogender. What do others think of adding Xenogender flag (

    ) to Non-binary gender#Symbols and observances? EarthFurst (talk) 20:23, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    It would need reliable secondary sources indicating that the community meaningfully uses this flag. Crossroads -talk- 22:14, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Jens Andersson

    [edit]

    Article mentions Jens Andersson as a historical example for non-binary gender. Please see the two sections of sources below, Andersson was in a same sex relationship during a time when this was an illegal act, and was imprisoned for such. Prescribing a gender identity post mortem is not scholarly work, and this is also mentioned in the first highlighted source.

    Recommending that this example be removed.

    Sources:

    https://www.nb.no/historier-fra-samlingen/jens-og-anne-christine/#:~:text=Nyborg%20points%20out,how%20I%20am%22.

    https://skeivtarkiv.no/en/skeivopedia/sodomy-between-women#:~:text=Another%20case%20which,court.%20(Stoa%202010). 76.184.170.169 (talk) 06:44, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Creating a "Media representation" section?

    [edit]

    Instead of jumping ahead and creating this section, I thought I'd post here first. Other identities have robust sections of this type, like Lesbian#Media representation, Bisexuality#Media, Asexuality#In media, and Intersex#In society. I was thinking of moving SOME content from Non-binary characters in fiction to such a section. I can come up with a mock version of this possible section if you think that would help. Otherwise, I am trying to pair down Non-binary characters in fiction a bit (focusing mainly on examples either with media coverage or scholarly analysis), so if you would like to help with that, it would be appreciated. Historyday01 (talk) 15:56, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    It would be best to base such a section on scholarly analysis if so. Some of that material, like at Bisexuality, just lists off certain media and cites contemporary entertainment news, which isn't as good. Crossroads -talk- 17:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I can agree with that, that makes perfect sense. Historyday01 (talk) 19:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Grammatical error in lead section

    [edit]

    this is going to sound really stupid but at the very start of the article where it talks about gender and sexuality being separate, there's a colon and there should be a semicolon instead but i don't have a wikipedia account and it's 2am

    64.193.85.10 (talk) 07:03, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    I did the edit, and a few more wording fixes. Thank you for pointing out this error.
    By the way, you can consider creating an account. See WP:ACCOUNT for the benefits of an account and criteria for creating an account. If you are having more trouble deciding whether to create one, you should also see Wikipedia:Why not create an account?
    Thank you — CrafterNova [ TALK ] [ CONT ] 07:16, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]