User talk:Marvelvsdc

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia, Marvelvsdc! I hope you like the place and decide to keep contributing. Since I see you've already been active here, let me just give you a few links that are always useful as a handy reference guide:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question at the village pump or feel free to ask me on my Talk page.
Oh, and just in case you don't already know: to sign your name on a Talk page like I did below, the easiest way is just to type four tildes (~~~~). To customize your signature, look here.
And remember:Be Bold!

Images

When uploading images please always edit the image description page and do two things:

State the source of the image (created yourself, the address of a web page or another source.)
State the copyright. The easiest way to list the copyright is to use a copyright tag. The most important tags are {{GFDL}}, {{PD}} and {{fairuse}} GFDL is for images that you create yourself. PD is for public domain images (pre-1923 in most cases). Fair use is for copyrighted images that we can use under the fair use rules in the USA.

Without proper source and copyright information, images will eventually be deleted!

For screenshots please use {{screenshot}}— Zeimusu | Talk

Bad links

When you're adding lists of stuff to pages and adding wikilinks to other pages, it would be really helpful if you'd check to see if the links actually go to relevant place. Adding links like Legends, Armageddon, and Millennium to the DCU page is pretty pointless, because in a general interest encyclopedia, those pages have nothing to do with the DC crossovers. Tverbeek 19:46, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Copyright Violations

Several pages you've created, including KGBeast, Monarch (comics) and The Cyclone Kids, have been placed on Wikipedia:Copyright problems, as they have been copied verbatum from various copyrighted sources. Feel free to rewrite them in your own words on a /temp page, and in the future, please take care not to copy and paste articles onto wikipedia. --InShaneee 03:33, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

U (DC characters)

Hi, I don't understand what your user page is all about, but that's not why I'm writing you.

For someone like me, who has no idea what "DC characters" are, an introductory sentence like the one I added myself to U (DC characters) is the least one can do. A simple question: Why did you remove it?

All the best, <KF> 00:32, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)

Preview button

In the future please use the preview button or attempt to do more than one minor edit at a time or something. This is concerning the 27 edits you made at Sega Dreamcast in the past two days. A good number of those being just 1 image being nonsensically switched back and forth. Everytime you save an edit the article you're saving is saved on the database causing a bloated page history list, not to mention that it unnecessarily drains server resources. Please keep this in mind. K1Bond007 04:00, May 26, 2005 (UTC)

X-Men

Could you please make sure you type it as X-Men, not X-men - especially with wikilinks, since they're case-sensitive. - SoM 22:42, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Dreamcast

Why the image should not be Dreamcast European? You want make a redundance in the Dreamcast article, shows 3 SAME controller images? The image that I'm uploaded shows details (Windows CE mark) and not repeating the controller image. -- Mateusc 02:50, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Take it up with someone else. The Dreamcast image is changed once again to the original. Except this one looks grey, and I still prefer mine as a kin to the other console pics.

File:Dreamcast005.jpg

. EDIT: The one you have up now is European. Its too big of a picture. The scan is huge. And its a grey version of a Dreamcast originally made in Europe. The pic has a nice high resolution, but it's not the original. It's like I would put a pic of NES 2, Ps2 redesigned, or GC with Wavebird, or Xbox with new controllers. Doesn't matter if it was designed in Europe or not, it came first in Japan. I understand the frustration and I know Dreamcast wasn't popular in Europe but an Encyclopedia is NOT a news article. Please read the article. -- Marvelvsdc 02:50, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

3RR warning

Hi Marvel, you've been reported for violating the Three revert rule (3RR) at Sega Dreamcast, under your user name and as User:24.125.136.245. If you violate 3RR again, you may be blocked from editing for up to 24 hours without further warning. Using multiple accounts or IP addresses to try to get round 3RR is also a policy violation: see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet. Please try to reach a consensus on the talk page. Cheers, SlimVirgin ^(talk) 22:50, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)

Also, Marvel, could you explain what you meant by this remark: "You are not wise, kicking me off will result in wide spread deletion of ready made and owned photos copyrighted by me alone. I submitted over 100 animated, and comic book images that can and will be marked for deletion. Thanks, marvelvsdc 84:17, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)" Many thanks, SlimVirgin ^(talk) 23:09, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)

Sure its simple. I am not here to cause dismay to the community but if I am voted out by this pool, I should be able to take my copyrighted material with me. And if conversation like this, in writing what I think is not a direct attack to a user but rather an explanation to my purpose in modifications than maybe I should leave.marvelvsdc 23:22, june 10, 2005 (UTC)

Which copyrighted material are you talking about exactly? Can you give examples? SlimVirgin ^(talk) 23:32, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)

Sure, I contributed by adding images in DC Comics related images from Justice League Unlimted, and Marvel Comic's X-Men. It is not affiliated with the problem at hand, but I should be able to take images I posted if I am considered for removal. Off the bat, one image is [[1]] marvelvsdc 23:34, june 10, 2005 (UTC)

Nevermind, most of those images are with the fair use law only a few were copyrighted by me in specific and I can't find them right now. My mistake. But if you need examples that Dreamcast one is one example. marvelvsdc 23:34, june 10, 2005 (UTC)

Regarding the example you gave above, did you create it? SlimVirgin ^(talk) 23:41, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)

Yes, I created it. I took it from a Japanese website, and resized the image. Most of my images I create with a Movie player. Define create and please negotiate the term. I could say I took the picture but the Movie player I took it with created it. Bye. marvelvsdc 23:34, june 10, 2005 (UTC)

That's not what's meant by "create." That means the image does not belong to you, and you're therefore not allowed to state that it's public domain, unless the copyright holder has said it is. Also, you don't have the means to delete images as you're not an admin. When you submit text or upload an image to WP, you cease to have any control over it, and you're not allowed to delete material simply because you're leaving, with the exception of your user page, which may be deleted on request. It would be a good idea if you would go through the images you've uploaded, and make sure they're marked "fair use" and not "public domain," as they're likely to be deleted by others if found to have been tagged incorrectly; you also need to add a link to the website you took them from, as unsourced images are also deleted. Many thanks, SlimVirgin ^(talk) 00:15, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)

>Category:Copyright holder released public domain images Sorry, I couldn't help but misinterpret this logo. I thought the user still has rights to its images. For instance, if I release a public image domain to a private organization, I can still have rights to the images as long as I am part of that organization. If I were to leave, I could simply take the images up. Media displays images on websites, but I might have the same images on another website. Therefore it could be considered as infringement if I were to leave and the images are no longer under my consent in being used.

I'm sorry, I don't understand what you wrote. If something has been released into the public domain by the copyright holder (by the owner, not by the editor who has uploaded it), anyone may use it for any purpose whatsoever, on any website.

You can't take any images with you when you leave. The only images that would apply to would be images you own and have given Wikipedia permission to use. But these images are no longer acceptable on Wikipedia: anything tagged "permission" is being deleted. Anyway, so far as I can tell, you're not the copyright holder on the images you've uploaded, so the point is moot.

I also note you said you wouldn't take the typos with you. Are you saying you own the copyright on text that you've written too? SlimVirgin ^(talk) 00:46, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)

Of Course I am? If you mean sole prioritor, yes I am. I am the only one who owns them because I took pictures of most of the images with codec Movie coding software. The player I used is by Media Player Classic. Since they have publicly released their movie player for screening purposes only, I have publicly released my photos. I am owner, editor and chief. What happens if I make a website? I own the website so I own the photos. In the mean time let Wikipedia do what ever they want with the photos. Mind you, I am only making a point.marvelvsdc 23:46, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)

I'm having difficulty understanding your point. If you're saying the images belong to you and are used here, and only here, with your permission until such time as you leave, I am going to nominate them for deletion, because they violate our terms of use. If you're saying you own an image that you have, in fact, taken from someone else's website, then you're quite wrong: you don't own it in virtue of having downloaded it, or photographed it, or taken a screenshot of it. If you used to own the images, but have placed them in the public domain, you can't control how they are used, and also can't take them with you when you leave. So there is no "in the meantime," you let Wikipedia do whatever we want with them. Please signal that you have understood this.

Regarding your comment about not owning the copyright on your typos, please explain further. Another editor was recently blocked for trying to claim copyright on text he had submitted, so I would appreciate it if you would word your response thoughtfully and clearly. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 03:24, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)

What I am saying is that if I and only I own the images and sell them to another website, than that Editor of that website has control of the images. Now if he becomes famous, he can mark them for deletion. I made the images, so in the real world yes, that is what I am saying. Look it up on goooo gle Copyright Enfringement cases. You can delete the images if you want it took me a minute to make them and someone else will end up putting the same ones back up anyways. This Democratic approach to the Internet is becoming more tolitarian by the second.

The last comment is regarded as a joke. First, Mateusc has blamed me for numerous typos so I thought a pun was in hand. He yells at other users as if you can't go back and edit small typos and no I cannot copyright typos. This was the case brought up for me being marked for deletion. He links an old article. Sure I look over articles and have typos. I wine like a baby, I sucked my mothers teet. You could even say, "I gon' an piss an wet me self." Sure, I am not afraid of admitting it. He shouldn't disciminate against the proper English grammer. marvelvsdc 24:46, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)

Okay, well I have no idea what you're talking about, so I'm going to refer this to someone else. In the meantime, it would be best if you were to stop uploading images. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 05:41, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)

Excuse-me, but this isn't true. I'm not offended you in any time, just report your vandalism and revert the edit war on Sega Dreamcast article trying to keep the discussion. --Mateusc 16:46, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

All your images uploaded

Hi, your doing a great job contributing to Wikipedia, however your process of providing new images for Wikipedia isnt consistent with Wikipedias rules. On your user page I noticed you have an interest in Fair Use, well then this should be fun! :)

Firstly!

Please ensure all your images that you upload have a Wikipedia:Image copyright tags see: Wikipedia:Image use policy for more details. Remember! Unless you drew/created the image COMPLETELY from scratch you dont own the rights to it, so please dont release images into the public domain you dont own!!
The images you have put a Wikipedia:Image copyright tags on, many of them are {{fairuse}} tags, please include a more suited tag; for a comic book cover: {{comiccover}} for a tv series or film: {{film-screenshot}} for a video game {{game-screenshot}}. See: Wikipedia:Image copyright tags (I have fixed some of them for you, please include appropriate tags in the future so I dont have to follow you around Wiki).
Now this is most important PLEASE include a FULL DESCRIPTION of what the image is of, please do not include abbreviations. Here are some of examples of descriptions that are not adequate; [[Image:Starra.jpg]], [[Image:Nhl03.jpg]], [[Image:Mariogolf.jpg]], [[Image:Terra.jpg]], [[Image:CyclKds.gif]]. Some of these I have no idea what the image is of, or from, or when it was first drawn/created. Dont assume the reader knows what GTA or GT3 is.... provide as much detail as you possibly can. The only way wikipedia can be considered legitmate by the general public (and academia) is to make sure we reference all our text contributions and include copyright information for all our images.

If it is a screenshot of a television series, include the full name of the television seroes, include the year it was made, who made it, what company released it, what channel aired it, what country it was made released for, what episode and what is happening in the image.
If it is a video game, please include the full title, what country it was made released for, what platform your playing it on, what developer made it, when the game was released, who published it, and whats happening in the image.
If it is a comic book, what country it was made released for, include the full name, the issue, who drew it, what company owns it etc etc.

Secondly!

As a common courtesy, when you upload your images make sure that the image name your uploading is very unique, I have noticed many of your image names are very common and in the future as wikipedia expands, we may find many naming conflicts!
Please be careful when you upload files that you dont upload the same image several times to different pages. Eg: [[Image:Dreamcast05.JPG]], [[Image:Dreamcast005.JPG]]. You have done this several times. Place a {{del}} tag on the image you no longer need.

Please remember if you dont includ a full description and full source of your images and include Wikipedia:Image copyright tags they may get deleted.

Signed UnlimitedAccess 00:55, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Yuga.jpg

Image deletion warning

The image Image:Yuga.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it will be deleted. If you have any information on the source or licensing of this image, please go there to provide the necessary information.

Colour Scheme

If you're making SHBes, use it. - SoM 4 July 2005 13:57 (UTC)

The information on this page is now deprecated.

Color scheme

For the comic_color and alliance_color parameters in {{Superherobox}} and {{Superteambox}}, and comic_color in {{Supersupportingbox}} and {{Comiccharacterbox}}, use the value from the appropriate "Color" cell in the following table.

**Color scheme for Superheroboxes, Superteamboxes, Supersupportingboxes and Supercbboxes**
comic_color
Color	Company
background:#ff8080	Marvel Comics
background:#8080ff	DC Comics
background:#ff0000	British comics such as IPC Magazines or DC Thomson
background:#80ffff	Dark Horse Comics
background:#ffff00	Raj Comics
background:#80ff80	Image Comics
background:#ff9900	Harvey Comics
background:#ff80ff	Any Japanese publisher, such as Shueisha or Kodansha
background:#c0c0c0	Other/Defunct
alliance_color
Color	Alliance
background:#ffc0c0	Hero
background:#c0c0ff	Villain
background:#cccccc	Neutral/None/Other
past_current_color
Color	Currently being published/not being published
background:#5be85b	In periodical publication
background:#ff9275	Not in periodical publication

Image:Vcolor1.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Vcolor1.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

Image:Madden 2004 3 ps2.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Madden 2004 3 ps2.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

Image:32X Blackthorn.png

Image deletion warning

Image:32X Blackthorn.png has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

Image:Alonedark.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Alonedark.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

Image:Darkseid.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Darkseid.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

Image:Dragonball.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Dragonball.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

Image:Dreamcast001.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Dreamcast001.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

Image:Dreamcast005.JPG

Image deletion warning

Image:Dreamcast005.JPG has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

Image:Dreamcast05.JPG

Image deletion warning

Image:Dreamcast05.JPG has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

Image:Acecombat.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Acecombat.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

Image:Fightersmix.jpg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file you have uploaded, Image:Fightersmix.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Image:Firestorm.jpg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file you have uploaded, Image:Firestorm.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Image:Firestorm1.jpg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file you have uploaded, Image:Firestorm1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Image

Image deletion warning

Image:Descent2-2.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

Listed under Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2005 September 9. Thunderbrand 01:45, September 9, 2005 (UTC)

Image:Amazo.jpg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file you uploaded, Image:Amazo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Image deletion

Image deletion warning

Image:Boerotj.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that thisimage should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

Listed under Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2005 September 16. Thunderbrand 19:29, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comics Collaboration of the Fortnight

As a member of WikiProject Comics, I thought you might be interested in the Comics Collaboration of the Fortnight we have set up. Please feel free to vote on the articles listed, although bear in mind that a vote for a particular article means you are pledging to help improve the article. The goal of the collaboration is to improve articles to Featured Article status, as we feel Comics is under-represented in that area. Thanks for your help. Steve block talk 15:47, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

DC Cosmic Cards

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as DC Cosmic Cards, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. For more information about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, take a look at our Five Pillars. Happy editing!

Eclipso

It appears that a large portion of the Eclipso information you added in March was copied from http://www.toonopedia.com/eclipso.htm. Copyright violations are illegal. Is there any more such material you have contributed? User:Zoe|^(talk) 21:03, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that you have edited since I left this message, but have chosen not to respond. Please let me know as soon as you see this, if you have made any more copyright violations. User:Zoe|^(talk) 17:55, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

u got the wrong guy, i only added what I remembered from reading eclipso. Someone else added that.--Marvelvsdc 02:07, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not according to this edit. User:Zoe|^(talk) 04:07, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I got the impression you could summarize articles. I also looked up information from DCUguide.com. I also summarize articles from comics I have read through memory. The key facts in that article are specifically of needed information. For instance, I know the Shadowfighters, and could have entered all the characters from memory and even know the issue (#13 eclispo) they died in. I don't know what issue Demon debuted in. If summarizing articles for stubs is a violation than please go ahead and remove any unwanted material. Please do what you must, but I beg you I could add useful information. Like under the Darkness within, I could add that Lar Gand found the diamond on the darkside of the moon where it layed dormant, from being shattered in space by another civilization. --Marvelvsdc 21:48, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

{{web-screenshot}} tag

I've noticed you've uploaded some images tagged with {{web-screenshot}}. This tag is not meant to be used for images that came from Web pages; it's meant to be used for images of Web pages (such as Image:Wikipedia.PNG, for example). I've retagged the images below as having no license information. Please edit the image description pages to include information about the licenses these images are under. —Bkell 05:43, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Burnside.jpg

One last chance

Please stop editing, and explain the link I supplied above, or I will be forced to block you from editing. User:Zoe|^(talk) 21:55, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked you indefinitely until you respond. It now appears that you also made a copyright violation at Damage (DC comics). How many more? User:Zoe|^(talk) 20:56, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

sorry guys, never touched that page, only thing I can think of is a hacker using my password--Marvelvsdc 23:01, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. User:Zoe|^(talk) 04:38, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Tomarre.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tomarre.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. — THOR ^=/\= 05:41, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:3do_logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:3do_logo.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 14:14, 22 February 2006 (UTC) =[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Blackcanary11.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Blackcanary11.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 08:13, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Ace_combat5.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ace_combat5.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 04:52, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:SegaDreamcast_highres.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SegaDreamcast_highres.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 15:42, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Teentitans2.JPG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Teentitans2.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 13:28, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Crimson fox.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Crimson fox.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:55, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added SOME Fair Use, but if you could go fill in the 'unknowns', that would really help. ThuranX 02:03, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bluedevil.jpg

I have tagged Image:Bluedevil.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 19:22, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Timberwolf2.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Timberwolf2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 21:17, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gladiatorimp.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gladiatorimp.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Amped2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Amped2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:41, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Iron Lantern

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Iron Lantern, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 15:00, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AmazingSpider-Man182.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AmazingSpider-Man182.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Teentitans2.JPG

A tag has been placed on Image:Teentitans2.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[Talk:Image:Teentitans2.JPG|the article's talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hennessey, Patrick (talk) 11:07, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Firehawk (comics)

The article Firehawk (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The fictional character does not meet the general notability guideline as a stand-alone subject.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jfgslo (talk) 05:11, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Coast City

The article Coast City has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The fictional city does not meet the general notability guideline and, without reception and significance in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject, the topic of the article is not suitable for Wikipedia as a stand-alone article since it falls into WP:IINFO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jfgslo (talk) 03:20, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Blackcanary11.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Blackcanary11.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:18, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Promethium (comics) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Promethium (comics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Promethium (comics) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ridernyc (talk) 21:54, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Parasitedc.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Parasitedc.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:03, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Czarnia recommended for deletion

Proposed deletion of Czarnia (comics)

The article Czarnia (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable planet within comics, and unreferenced for 8 years

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 86.186.86.14 (talk) 23:54, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Blüdhaven for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blüdhaven is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blüdhaven until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:08, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Speed Force for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Speed Force is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Speed Force until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 11:38, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Darkseid's Elite

The article Darkseid's Elite has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 21:28, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Darkseid's Elite for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Darkseid's Elite is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darkseid's Elite until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 19:59, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fawcett City

The article Fawcett City has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:32, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Major Victory (DC Comics)

The article Major Victory (DC Comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 04:25, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nebiros (DC Comics)

The article Nebiros (DC Comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 23:39, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Invaders (DC Comics)

The article Invaders (DC Comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 17:53, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mysto

The article Mysto has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 12:25, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Myrwhydden

The article Myrwhydden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 11:54, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fawcett City for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fawcett City is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fawcett City until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:10, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Crimesmith

The article Crimesmith has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 13:07, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Crimesmith for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Crimesmith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crimesmith until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 20:18, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of AmerTek

The article AmerTek has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 11:55, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lightray (character)

The article Lightray (character) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 12:42, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lightray (character) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lightray (character) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lightray (character) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 17:52, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of cosmic entities in DC Comics for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of cosmic entities in DC Comics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cosmic entities in DC Comics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:32, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of WEB (comics)

The article WEB (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:56, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hellhound (comics)

The article Hellhound (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:05, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Supergirl (Matrix) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Supergirl (Matrix) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supergirl (Matrix) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:34, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of cosmic entities in DC Comics for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of cosmic entities in DC Comics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cosmic entities in DC Comics (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

–LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 23:41, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Flash Museum for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flash Museum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flash Museum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:39, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Coast City

The article Coast City has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:27, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stuff the Chinatown Kid

The article Stuff the Chinatown Kid has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 21:30, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]