Talk:Mulholland Drive (film)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mulholland Drive (film) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3: 90 days

Mulholland Drive (film) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 19, 2016.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 12, 2008	WikiProject peer review	Reviewed
April 21, 2008	Peer review	Reviewed
May 12, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
May 21, 2008	Featured article candidate	Promoted
Current status: Featured article

Film: French / Core / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the French cinema task force.
	This article is on the project's core list.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article has an archived peer review.

United States: Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Top-importance).

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

“David Lynch talks Mulholland Drive” interview

That video is on YouTube, I think the link to the video should be added to “external links”, but I don’t know its source.--DonGuess (talk) 19:47, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I added the link, please check if everything is okay with it--DonGuess (talk) 17:07, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Themes and interpretation

This hour long analysis appeared recently on youtube, and I think knocks all the other pieces off the board: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OiCfHW3N3vo It covers pretty much every detail, and concludes that the woman in apartment 12 is Betty/Diane after she's been spat out by Hollywood. Unsure if it can be considered a reliable source. Shtove (talk) 18:56, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:SPS. DonQuixote (talk) 18:59, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What Don said. On the plus side, it'll kill an hour during all the COVID madness. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 19:47, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Greatest of ALL time vs Greatest of 21st century

I'd say being voted as the best film of the 21st century by an esteemed panel is enough to be one of the greatest films of all time. Being ranked 28th best movie of all time by one of the most prestigious groups in cinema history is also a reason to put it as a greatest of all time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boomyeahboss (talk • contribs) 05:17, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Boomyeahboss: I think differently. Especially because the lead says "widely regarded as..." which gives the impression that most critics and publications hold that opinion, which is not the case. Most publications mentioned here specify that it is considered one of the best films of the decade\century. Therefore the lead is accurate as it now stands. - Daveout(talk) 13:31, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The general phrasing violates WP:PUFFERY. Just report each of the two polls (all-time and 21st-century) and perhaps add more as needed. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 16:05, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I actually have a bigger problem with the term "widely regarded" when you've basically just got one poll describing it in such terms. I agree that the generalisation is not necessary when all you've got is two polls. Betty Logan (talk) 23:40, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ebert didn't give it 4 stars at first

If I'm not mistaken it was around 2, and he changed it to 4 straight after it got awards and critical acclaim. 91.231.118.246 (talk) 13:11, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you are mistaken. If he did, he changed it before he and Richard Roeper reviewed it on At the Movies; here is his original review of the film on siskelebert.org: https://siskelebert.org/?p=12650 Cryptkeeperfun (talk) 16:55, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Classic"

"Mulholland Drive has been compared with Billy Wilder's film noir classic Sunset Boulevard (1950), another tale about broken dreams in Hollywood"

Is it ok to call something a "classic" as a factual statement in an encyclopedia? Isn't it more of a subjective thing rather than saying "it is widely regarded as a classic"? Is it against NPOV? I'm asking out of curiosity. Dornwald (talk) 00:35, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]